A Resolution for the retention of Liberty via Nullification and Interposition:

A manifest need for an increased participation by the common citizen

Let it here be known that this message of correspondence wishes to communicate to the legislatures of the many states good will, friendship, and a manifest need for an increased participation by the common citizen in the functions of republican government, as well as the increased usage of nullification and interposition by the states in compact when unconstitutional acts are undertaken by the general government.

American liberties – the rights natural to mankind – are not mere permits granted by Presidents, Legislatures, or authoritative governmental bodies of jurisprudence, but prototypical rights, the very condition humankind is born into, having in the least the same level of lawful importance and preceding in existence that of any government. That any number of our rights come to us through the bonds of ancestral inheritance, once assented to as truisms and accepted as orthodoxy and foundational principles which precede any regulatory authority which attempts to alter them now. We, as individuals of our States and those who live under constitutional compact in these, the United States, have an absolute and unalterable right to our American liberties – the natural rights of mankind.

To imagine that government may, through any reasonable course, overturn, supersede, or alter the earthly foundations of human nature, of that natural state into which we are all born, is contrary to the concepts of American liberty and our natural rights. Should the concepts of truth, equal justice under the law, a government for the common good, or Republican form of government be removed, then the framework laid out by our founders is no more. Our inheritance as Western men and women gone. And our liberty and natural rights stripped of us.

We – average Americans – have been reticent to both contemplate and speak publicly the truth that is before us. The mob against us, against truth, and against reality has grown. Our voices remained silent for fear of that dastardly horde which has been set upon the few who so dared to speak truth. We have been unwilling, felt a restrained reluctance and fearful hesitancy to demand – absolutely demand – that which our natural right, authority, and power here on this earth allow. No longer can the average person, the common man, the traditional American remain silent. No longer can we accept the false reality placed in front of us by that which claims to be ‘American’ media (which does not hold the interests of America at hand) or those savage proponents who parrot its messages of hate and division. From here forward we will remain confident in declaring these antiliberty and antihuman acts for that which they truly are.

But what has caused us, up to this point, to remain rather quiet and reserved in our demands of liberty? Is it our nature? Is it based somewhere in the history of modern Western man? Or is it something else? Those who first sought our shores had been beaten into a cruel silence by those shameful benefactors of English rule. Yet, those rebels who at once rose against the Crown in secession here America were not timid in the least. They were men of action who risked their ease, estates, purses, pleasures, and blood for us to have these liberties. They fought with fewer men, fewer arms, and a smaller treasury than our minds may ever allow us to imagine. And against all odds, having succeeded in secession as a result of revolution these men forged a compact of states whose lawful foundation was that of liberty and the natural rights of mankind. Perhaps then, it is not likely that our timidity comes from those great ancestors who fought for liberty and won their own independence.

Perhaps it is for appearances that we have remained quiet for so long, though this I tend to think not. For appearances in this day and age are for the young, for the brash progressive and those so inclined towards the favor of their emotionally zealous – yet too often uneducated – peers.

Could it be that our quiet temperament which allows us to live under expansive central government has made us unwilling to speak and act upon our liberty? This may be closer to the truth than we wish. For our acquiescence to whims bureaucratic governance appears to have left us willing to be administrated to at most any moment, related to most any cause. As the compact between the states has slowly been destroyed, so too has our willingness to speak out against the harms which tear at its structural framework. Kindly disposition and a natural tendency to be agreeable has left us – the people so maligned – almost incapable of the manly assertion required of any who wish to retain their natural rights. It is my belief that a large portion of American and Western society is this way: too kindly to protest the pot as the water begins to boil.

The progressive hoard, the general government, and the TechPolitburo which carries the contrived narrative into the home of every family has managed consent to many things which are flagrantly harmful and undesirable to the common citizen. As well, they have cultivated a sense of unconscious submission which has bred in the average person a dangerous docility whose only end is public martyrdom, serfdom, or death.

In leaving the people to such peril it can be justly said that any authority wielded by such a group is unlawful at best and treasonous at worst. To act against the public good in such long and injurious ways cannot go unspoken, or unrectified.

Have we not been treated with disdainful impudence by those who lead the liberal national order? Have not candidates for the office of President cast one-half of this nation into a basket of deplorables? Declared us racists? Nazi’s? And even Domestic Terrorists? How can we, homemakers and parents, doctors and nurses, laborers and those in service industry, policemen and firefighters, soldiers, sailors, and airmen not be rightfully disgusted by the browbeating we have received? Should a man remain tame and submit with battered indifference to those who wish his head upon the public pyre?

We have been told that any talk of ‘States Rights’ is duly offensive expression. That the progressive machine in all its forms cannot and will not hear such talk from Nazi’s and racists, as they so often brand us. That the Progressive machine, the administrative bloc, the TechPolitburo holds power and thus is right to act upon the wishes of the mob it has raised against us. That our own judgment and sentiment is something we should come to doubt, and that even though we see the fault and harm before us in the dangerous and often riotous actions, we must know our own eyes lie and that which they speak is truer than anything we may experience. We have been told by Congressman and American Presidents that the army is unstoppable if pressed against the people, that the purse of this nation is unending, and that nuclear arms and fighter jets of the most advanced kind will be used against those who speak out too loudly or too often. We have seen the police state in action, political prisoners whose only crime was protesting detained for years without trial. We have seen mobs engage in violence and destruction that tore a path across this nation for an entire summer, resulting in more than a billion dollars in damage. We have seen those unwilling to bend to the mob beaten, maimed, and even killed.

So, let me ask you, sir, or madam reader: Do you consider yourself an advocate of liberty or of rebellion? Are you not representing the very constitution which all of our states have signed onto? Or are you representative of a central government which acts beyond the bounds of its own authority with no regard to rights of States or its citizens therein? If you are the former, then at no time can you be in lawful rebellion. For if you are a representative of the rights of man as enshrined in our own Bill of Rights then you are no more rebel than they a lawful central power. At no point do you require the consent of central government to exercise that liberty which you lawfully retain. The central government wishes to treat us as administrative numbers to be shifted, added, or deleted from the balance as necessary to retain its hegemonic existence.

The prospect now before us, modern Americans, ought to require of us the same level of attention those who wish to enslave us engage with. Nothing short of our own considerable action may free us from the future serfdom they hope to establish upon this land. This is a formal plan, designed by central government and all those in league with them to be implemented in a stepwise fashion so that the people are amicable to each new level of constraint placed upon their natural liberties. The initial step has been to slowly subvert the entire system of western government, to de-establish the system of our Founders, by the introduction of an equitable progressivism rooted in a subversive globalist order. Like our Churches and Schools, once places of sound worship and formal education, the system our founder handed down to us exists in a state of shameful ruination. The globalist tendencies of our central government have been exposed by the public any number of times, yet still these plans continue unabated. How to stop them globally I leave to the thoughts of greater men.

However, it is for these reasons and a thousand others that this resolution was drafted. That the general government in its many ways and forms has overstepped the lawful boundaries from which it was designed. At present, counter-revolution is our course. For it is not the overthrow of an unjust system which we seek but rather a return to good government through the lawful means which lay enshrined within the constitution.

A Resolution for the retention of Liberty via Nullification and Interposition:

1.      A resolution by the sovereign people of the many states to hold the general government to account for its repeated usurpations of power:

a.      That the original compact of states held under title of ‘Constitution of the United States’ and its various amendments constituted in general government solely that limited authority which the many states delegated to it.

b.     That each of the many states signed to that compact retain all other rights, both written and unwritten, of sovereign states, or that those rights are held by the people respectively.

c.      That when the general government assumes any power that is not delegated, that the act is null, void, and of no force.

d.     That the general government has no final, exclusive, or plenary authority to measure or judge for itself the extent of its own powers or those powers of the states.

e.      That in all cases which involve powers not delegated, the states are the final arbiters of disputes for they are preceding sovereign entities and retain all the powers of sovereign states.

2.     Our Union of the many states, in all its lawful forms, is necessary for the function of general government:

a.      When acting in strict accordance with the powers delegated to it, general government may help promote the happiness, prosperity, and societal bonds which act as unifying aspects of the American experience.

b.     However, when acting beyond its lawful scope each action taken by the general government is a usurpation of the sovereignty of the States and the individual citizens, and therefore each action is one of treason against said lawful sovereignty.

3.     When, in the case of an abuse or usurpation by the general government or its agents of central authority:

a.      The people must have an avenue of redress and remedy that does NOT require the consent of, or ruling by, the general government - for no organization or agency that is a party to a dispute may lawfully be the final arbiter of said dispute.

b.     Nullification and Interposition, actions taken by sovereign states on behalf of their citizens, seem to be the natural and rightful remedy in such a case.

c.      The expectation that, should the people not retain this avenue, they would be subject to the unlimited abuses of federal authorities.

d.     That such abuse is not in accordance with the Constitution or limits of rightful government.

4.     That Congress, Executive, and Federal Courts, bodies derived from the compact itself, may only act in ways specified within the constitution and that any action beyond such limits is unauthoritative and treasonous to the liberty of the people.

a.      That, if such an act is allowed to stand, the effects which may flow from it are crimes of numerous type and kind which further encroach upon the liberty and rights of the common citizen.

b.     Without such actions as nullification and interposition the common man and the State have no lawful vertical check on central government.

c.      Having no vertical check, the common man may be reduced, without due process, to that of criminal or domestic terrorist by the passions and demands of a single agent of government.

d.     That as such suspicious and dangerous acts are now at hand, those who seek to reclaim their constitutional rights and liberties – those of the States and the People – may fall necessarily into the above criminal category by a frenzied, seditious, and despotic government who rules by lead.

Such delusions by the current kakistocracy, and any continued silence by those whose sentiments with which we align, are unhealthy to any form of government, and the truest poison to the Body Populus of a Republic. Let no such action continue on either side. Let the chains of liberty bind the constitution to its rightful place, and let the States reclaim that which has been delegated as often as is needed to retain mankind in his natural, happy state.

Should the limits be implemented, and sword of nullification and shield of interposition be carried by all into the states which they inhabit, then the officers who represent us within our State Legislatures, State Courts, and State Executives will be heroes of liberty and the rightful heirs to the American Foundation.

May Locke, Paine, and Jefferson guide you.

May the favor of God Almighty rest with our cause.

And may we see a return to good governance once more.

Be Kind To Your Neighbors,

CulturalHusbandry, 1776/2022