In our increasingly interconnected global landscape, we find ourselves facing a complex web of challenges created by faulty globalist policies that are raising concerns among those who advocate for a more nationalistic approach to governance. These issues span economic vulnerability, a loss of national control, cultural erosion, security challenges, and economic inequality. This article delves into the adverse consequences of globalism and highlights the merits of nationalism as a positive alternative.
One of the primary problems arising from globalism is economic vulnerability. The emphasis on supranational organizations and open borders, while intended to foster economic cooperation and growth, can make nations economically vulnerable by rendering them dependent on foreign suppliers and markets which themselves are dictated to by unaccountable and unelected Aristocrats. This dependency results in an imbalance of power, where a select few select organizations dominate the global economic landscape. For nations that do not have the economic prowess to negotiate favorable terms, globalism headed by such Aristocrats has led to detrimental consequences. Nationalism, in contrast, places a greater emphasis on growing and protecting domestic industries and preserving national economic interests. These policies prioritize the development of a country's own economy and workforce, fostering self-sufficiency and reducing reliance on external sources.
Additionally, globalism can result in a significant loss of control over national policies and decision-making. The integration into global organizations (WEF, WHO, Federal Reserve, etc.) and adherence to international agreements not voted on by the people of any nation then require nations to comply with regulations and standards that do not necessarily align with their unique needs and circumstances, or even the basic will of their people. As a result, this loss of sovereignty can leave nations unable to fully address their domestic priorities and adapt to their individual challenges. Nationalism, on the other hand, emphasizes the importance of individuals retaining control over policies and decisions, ensuring that the interests of the people remain at the forefront.
Cultural erosion is another critical concern arising from globalism. The influx of non-western, global ideas and influences dilutes a nation's cultural identity, especially those nations that are attempting to be accepting of peoples and ideologies which run contrary to those of the host country. For proponents of nationalism, the preservation and promotion of a country's cultural heritage and traditions are vital components of a nation's identity and pride. The fear of losing cultural distinctiveness and traditional values is a genuine concern for those who recognize that the greatest and most lasting parts of 2000 years of Western Tradition are actively being villainized and destroyed.
Globalism has also compromised national security, particularly through open borders and the unrestricted movement of people and drugs across our Southern border. This has made it more challenging for us to secure our border and protect against potential security threats, including human trafficking, terrorism, cartels and various other illegal activities that occur in, around, and because of our open Southern Border. Nationalists argue that safeguarding national security requires stricter border control and immigration policies that prioritize the safety and well-being of our nation's citizens, and base entry on Merit and an ability to integrate into society as a high functioning member. At a time when fentanyl, surging across our border, is responsible for more than 70,000 American deaths annually, border security is of paramount importance.
Nationalism, as a guiding principle, also champions the avoidance of unnecessary conflicts on the global stage. One of the prime examples of this approach is the restraint exercised in steering clear of entanglements in foreign conflicts such as the war in Ukraine-Russia and Israel-Gaza hostilities. Nationalists argue that channeling resources towards peaceful, diplomatic solutions, rather than funneling funds into overseas conflicts, can serve to benefit the American people and bolster the nation's well-being. By focusing on diplomatic endeavors and allocating resources to address domestic needs, nationalists prioritize the preservation of American lives and resources rather than becoming embroiled in distant conflicts which fuel the Uniparty War Machine. This approach aligns with the notion that a nation's primary duty is to its own citizens, and only through their prosperity and security can a nation make a meaningful contribution to the world.
Moreover, economic inequality within and between nations is a guaranteed outcome of globalism. While global trade and interconnected markets have the potential to benefit nations, in reality, it often benefits supranational corporations more than local businesses and workers. The concentration of wealth in the hands of a few powerful entities has exacerbated income inequality and has left working-class citizens struggling to make ends meet. Currently, 66% of Americans are working paycheck-to-paycheck while the Global 1% control over 40% of the world's wealth. Housing has become unaffordable as banks are now conducting mass layoff due to a titanic drop in new mortgages and real estate sales. The only groups capable of buying property are the Black Rocks and State Streets of Wall Street whose purpose is little more than wealth consolidation and neo-feudalism. Nationalists argue for economic policies that prioritize the well-being of the nation's citizens, aiming to reduce economic disparities and protect domestic industries.
As we navigate the intricate challenges of our global landscape, the repercussions of globalism as run by our current crop of Aristocrats has become entirely evident. The vulnerabilities in the global economic system, the erosion of national control, cultural collapse and the rise of non-western values, security dilemmas, and economic inequalities all illuminate the compelling case for a nationalist approach. Nationalism, with its steadfast focus on safeguarding national identity, bolstering economic self-sufficiency, and fortifying border security, emerges as a compelling alternative. While globalism purports to foster international cooperation and interconnectedness, the tangible outcomes underscore the paramount importance of striking a harmonious balance between global and national interests to ensure the prosperity and well-being of individual nations. For the everyday people living with the results of globalism as handed down by the Davos and Beltway Crowd, the resounding call to embrace nationalism as a counterweight to globalism transcends theoretical discourse; it stands as a pragmatic and pressing imperative in our contemporary world.
Be Kind To Your Neighbors,
Cultural Husbandry